Ziad elJishi
North American Committee Against Zionism and Imperialism (NACAZAI)
[See next post for Arabic version -- Arab Nationalist Weblog editorial committee]
It has become obvious to all, the servitude and client behavior of the Abu Mazen and Dahlan clan of the Palestinian Authority (PA), in the service of the triangle of evil; US, “Israel”, and the Arab regimes!!
The amount of love and support bestowed upon those two, and those who follow them, by the enemy in the aftermath of the Hamas coup in Gaza , must make angry any honest patriot of the Arab and Islamic Ummah.
It showed clearly where the loyalty and dedication is of the Abu Mazen clan. This loyalty does not lie towards their people, but rather the enemy; America , " Israel ”, the Arab regimes, and for the abortion of the resistance option in Palestine and all over the Arab homeland.
What Hamas did in Gaza deserves our support and respect. We are really amazed at those who argue against “internal fighting”, and such, in what took place in Gaza .
If this shows anything, it clearly shows how ignorant those people are of the circumstances of liberation struggles historically, all over the world on one hand, and the particulars of the Palestinian conditions in specific. This is with keeping to our position against the Oslo process itself, and our rejection of the legitimacy of any government erected underneath its political ceiling, as we will explain later.
First off ,in the history of liberation struggles, all over the world, it has been demonstrated that the liberation movement has always had to contend with two enemies simultaneously, in its quest for independence through armed liberation.
We are looking at ann external enemy, in which the direct occupying forces are confronted, on one hand, and an internal enemy of equal danger, on the other hand. This internal enemy penetrates into the liberation movement and tries to take over control of it. It assumes power over it. At the same time, it is conspiring with the occupying forces and working to abort the liberation struggle itself.
What this translates into is a fifth column embedded into the liberation movement, working and conspiring against it! This very nature prevents any form of 'dialogue’ with it. In fact, the very treasonous nature of this fifth column places it in an antagonistic position against the liberation movement and its objectives. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is to confront those elements and purge the liberation struggle from them by force.
Secondly, with regards to the Palestinian circumstances in particular, what happened in Gaza is not something to place under the title of fighting amongst each other as some have tried to do. This is true even if some elements on both sides entered this struggle with those intentions or are working to make this conflict one over assuming power in the future.
The truth of this struggle lies in the simple fact that there is on one side a group supporting resistance and the resistance path in engaging the enemy, and on the other side there is a group working for surrender and capitulation to the enemy. One camp is launching Alqassam rockets onto the Zionist enemy, and one camp is pointing to the location of resistance fighters; spying at them in order for the Zionist Apache rockets and assassination teams to liquidate them.
This camp that has been appointed by the triangle of evil which represents the Oslo project. It is not in place for the interest of the Arab or Palestinian people, but is in the service of the enemy. Therefore, it has no legitimacy as far as we are concerne,d and is not part of our camp, goal,s and objectives. Therefore, we refuse to recognize it.
Since 1993, the Oslo track has delivered defeat. Instead, our people have chosen the path of resistance and the liberation of the entire historical land of Palestine . Anyone who crosses those red-lines is placing themselves outside the legitimate representation of our people and their cause. The people demonstrated this choice by first electing Hamas to the PA government, (which we do not recognize). Secondly, they handed Gaza to Hama on a silver platter during the latest coup.
In this era of American servitude and surrender, isn’t it an amazing accomplishment that our Arab and Islamic Ummah chose the path of resistance from Iraq to Palestine !
This is an amazing fact, considering the conspiracies of those who are active in spreading defeatist and surrenderist thought amongst our people. It becomes clear then that anyone who is in the camp of the resistance is amongst our people, and anyone outside the camp of the resistance is removed and is outside the ranks of our people.
After so many years of enduring the corruption of the PA and the failure of the humiliating Oslo agreements with the enemy, our people handed power to Hamas. Even with the mercenary security forces of Dahlan in Gaza , they were unable to resist the coup made by Hamas and simply ran away.
So that no one accuses us of being biased towards one group of the Palestinian resistance against another, we call upon all honest and patriotic forces in Fateh and all over the spectrum of Palestinian groups, to support the honorable coup made by Hamas in Gaza . This will serve as a prelude to bringing down the PA structure itself; a structure that is based on the illegitimate Oslo surrenderist agreements which stand outside the legality of the revolutionary agreement made by all Palestinians and their forces. All the Palestiniann forces must abide by and following the original and unamended Palestinian National Charter. The Palestinian National Charter, in its unamended form, is the true representative of the Palestinian people and the legal authority that speaks their voice.
Those who circulate the explanation of what has taken place in Gaza, as a fight amongst brothers, are actually serving the enemy, by finding a way out for the Oslo PA group that has been defeated.
The correct line that we must espouse, is that we should stand with the Hamas coup in Gaza , by supporting the bringing down of the PA structure and the entire Oslo process itself. By doing this, we would have correctly supported the option of resistance over the option of surrender!
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق